þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Michigan | 38-2030505 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) | ||
600 N. Centennial, Zeeland, Michigan | 49464 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Shares Outstanding | ||
Class | at July 22, 2011 | |
Common Stock, $0.06 Par Value | 143,118,502 |
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements. |
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 444,619,932 | $ | 348,349,773 | ||||
Short-term investments |
24,116,803 | 86,447,596 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
111,859,028 | 95,647,612 | ||||||
Inventories |
119,457,528 | 100,728,730 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
25,591,359 | 24,095,563 | ||||||
Total current assets |
725,644,650 | 655,269,274 | ||||||
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET |
232,716,169 | 205,107,756 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
||||||||
Long-term investments |
142,684,806 | 129,091,167 | ||||||
Patents and other assets, net |
12,974,283 | 13,222,442 | ||||||
Total other assets |
155,659,089 | 142,313,609 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,114,019,908 | $ | 1,002,690,639 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
INVESTMENT |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 63,282,992 | $ | 40,295,464 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
40,518,523 | 31,793,165 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
103,801,515 | 72,088,629 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
46,517,399 | 37,071,184 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
||||||||
Common stock |
8,587,110 | 8,537,528 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
368,979,703 | 347,834,218 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
561,344,112 | 514,842,177 | ||||||
Other shareholders investment |
24,790,069 | 22,316,903 | ||||||
Total shareholders investment |
963,700,994 | 893,530,826 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders investment |
$ | 1,114,019,908 | $ | 1,002,690,639 | ||||
- 2 -
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
$ | 243,001,541 | $ | 201,560,960 | $ | 493,947,438 | $ | 387,329,889 | ||||||||
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
157,376,970 | 127,667,134 | 318,006,130 | 244,867,694 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
85,624,571 | 73,893,826 | 175,941,308 | 142,462,195 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Engineering, research and
development |
20,245,757 | 15,222,622 | 39,160,518 | 29,561,140 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general
& administrative |
12,131,922 | 9,884,445 | 23,443,024 | 19,506,399 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
32,377,679 | 25,107,067 | 62,603,542 | 49,067,539 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
53,246,892 | 48,786,759 | 113,337,766 | 93,394,656 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||||||||||
Investment income |
598,455 | 556,004 | 1,098,025 | 1,068,887 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
3,902,721 | 998,302 | 6,767,539 | 3,562,774 | ||||||||||||
Total other income |
4,501,176 | 1,554,306 | 7,865,564 | 4,631,661 | ||||||||||||
Income before provision
for income taxes |
57,748,068 | 50,341,065 | 121,203,330 | 98,026,317 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
19,275,899 | 16,283,735 | 40,398,279 | 31,506,857 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 38,472,169 | $ | 34,057,330 | $ | 80,805,051 | $ | 66,519,460 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Cash Dividends Declared per Share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.22 |
- 3 -
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 80,805,051 | $ | 66,519,460 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,283,279 | 19,553,096 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
539,865 | 439,689 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of investments |
(5,177,464 | ) | (3,463,538 | ) | ||||
Impairment loss on available-for-sale securities |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,328,085 | 301,435 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense related to employee
stock options, employee stock purchases and restricted
stock |
6,419,575 | 4,870,212 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(2,599,659 | ) | (497,436 | ) | ||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(16,211,416 | ) | (22,294,349 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(18,728,798 | ) | (25,671,717 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
765,712 | 2,655,958 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
22,987,528 | 16,806,867 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities, excluding dividends declared |
7,203,272 | 7,886,131 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
104,615,030 | 67,105,808 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Plant and equipment additions |
(48,995,466 | ) | (19,095,284 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment |
77,509 | 261,328 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in investments |
53,504,964 | (78,992,662 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
2,474,000 | (5,483,679 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
7,061,007 | (103,310,297 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock from
stock plan transactions |
14,775,493 | 25,392,689 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid |
(32,781,030 | ) | (30,559,224 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
2,599,659 | 497,436 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
(15,405,878 | ) | (4,669,099 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS |
96,270,159 | (40,873,588 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
beginning of period |
348,349,773 | 336,108,446 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
end of period |
$ | 444,619,932 | $ | 295,234,858 | ||||
- 4 -
(1) | The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Registrant believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Registrants 2010 annual report on Form 10-K. |
(2) | In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Registrant as of June 30, 2011, and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. |
(3) | Adoption of New Accounting Standards |
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 amends ASC 820 to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amended guidance requires information disclosure regarding transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, information disclosure regarding sensitivity of a fair value measurement categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to changes in unobservable inputs and any interrelationships between those unobservable inputs, and the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value. The amended guidance is effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
In June 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. Under ASU 2011-05, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate consecutive statements. The amended guidance is effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
(4) | Investments |
The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures for its financial assets and liabilities, and to its non-financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 provides a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities. This framework is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards that permit, or in some cases, require estimates of fair-market value. This standard also expanded financial statement disclosure requirements about a companys use of fair-value measurements, including the effect of such measure on earnings. |
The Companys investment securities are classified as available for sale and are stated at fair value based on quoted market prices. Assets or liabilities that have recurring measurements are shown below as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010: |
- 5 -
(4) | Investments (continued) |
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Total as of | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | June 30, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
$ | 444,619,932 | $ | 444,619,932 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Short-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Government Securities |
24,054,390 | 24,054,390 | | | ||||||||||||
Other |
62,413 | 62,413 | | | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks |
61,706,850 | 61,706,850 | | | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds Equity |
71,062,101 | 71,062,101 | | | ||||||||||||
Limited Partnership Equity |
9,059,455 | | 9,059,455 | | ||||||||||||
Certificate of Deposit |
500,000 | | 500,000 | | ||||||||||||
Other Equity |
356,400 | 356,400 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 611,421,541 | $ | 601,862,086 | $ | 9,559,455 | $ | | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Total as of | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | December 31, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
$ | 348,349,773 | $ | 348,349,773 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Short-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Government Securities |
36,136,760 | 36,136,760 | | | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
50,156,250 | | 50,156,250 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
154,586 | 154,586 | | | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks |
63,637,711 | 63,637,711 | | | ||||||||||||
Mutual Funds Equity |
55,234,901 | 55,234,901 | | | ||||||||||||
Limited Partnership Equity |
9,363,555 | | 9,363,555 | | ||||||||||||
Certificate of Deposit |
500,000 | | 500,000 | | ||||||||||||
Other Equity |
355,000 | 355,000 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 563,888,536 | $ | 503,868,731 | $ | 60,019,805 | $ | | ||||||||
- 6 -
(4) | Investments (continued) |
The Company determines the fair value of its U.S. Treasury Notes by utilizing monthly valuation statements that are provided by its broker. The broker bases the investment valuation by using the bid price in the market. The Company also refers to third party sources to validate valuations. In addition, the Company determines the fair value of its limited partnership equity investments by utilizing monthly valuation statements that are provided by the limited partnership. The limited partnership bases its equity investment valuations on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment. |
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and market value of investment securities are shown as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010: |
Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market value | |||||||||||||
Short-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Government Securities |
$ | 24,058,998 | $ | 4,731 | $ | (9,339 | ) | $ | 24,054,390 | |||||||
Other |
62,413 | | | 62,413 | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks |
45,309,491 | 16,660,519 | (263,160 | ) | 61,706,850 | |||||||||||
Mutual Funds-Equity |
55,701,057 | 15,473,869 | (112,825 | ) | 71,062,101 | |||||||||||
Limited Partnership Equity |
7,779,258 | 1,280,197 | | 9,059,455 | ||||||||||||
Certificate of Deposit |
500,000 | | | 500,000 | ||||||||||||
Other Equity |
338,506 | 17,894 | | 356,400 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 133,749,723 | $ | 33,437,210 | $ | (385,324 | ) | $ | 166,801,609 | |||||||
Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Market value | |||||||||||||
Short-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Government Securities |
$ | 36,137,467 | $ | 9,254 | $ | (9,961 | ) | $ | 36,136,760 | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes |
50,095,921 | 60,329 | | 50,156,250 | ||||||||||||
Other |
154,586 | | | 154,586 | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks |
44,899,944 | 18,819,518 | (81,751 | ) | 63,637,711 | |||||||||||
Mutual Funds-Equity |
42,106,776 | 13,128,125 | | 55,234,901 | ||||||||||||
Limited Partnership Equity |
7,844,022 | 1,519,533 | | 9,363,555 | ||||||||||||
Certificate of Deposit |
500,000 | | | 500,000 | ||||||||||||
Other Equity |
338,506 | 16,494 | | 355,000 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 182,077,222 | $ | 33,553,253 | $ | (91,712 | ) | $ | 215,538,763 | |||||||
- 7 -
(4) | Investments (continued) |
Unrealized losses on investments as of June 30, 2011, are as follows: |
Aggregate Unrealized Losses | Aggregate Fair Value | |||||||
Less than one year |
$ | (385,324 | ) | $ | 26,774,133 | |||
Greater than one year |
| |
Aggregate Unrealized Losses | Aggregate Fair Value | |||||||
Less than one year |
$ | (91,712 | ) | $ | 17,007,886 | |||
Greater than one year |
| |
ASC 320, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, as amended and interpreted, provided guidance on determining when an investment is other than temporarily impaired. The Company reviews its fixed income and equity investment portfolio for any unrealized losses that would be deemed other-than-temporary and require the recognition of an impairment loss in income. If the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value, the Company evaluates, among other factors, general market conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair value is less than cost, and the Companys intent and ability to hold the investments. Management also considers the type of security, related-industry and sector performance, as well as published investment ratings and analyst reports, to evaluate its portfolio. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. If market, industry, and/or investee conditions deteriorate, the Company may incur future impairments. No equity investment losses were considered to be other than temporary at June 30, 2011. |
Fixed income securities as of June 30, 2011, have contractual maturities as follows: |
Due within one year |
$ | 24,116,803 | ||
Due between one and five years |
500,000 | |||
Due over five years |
|
(5) | Inventories consisted of the following at the respective balance sheet dates: |
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 75,073,158 | $ | 62,857,800 | ||||
Work-in-process |
19,045,023 | 13,055,237 | ||||||
Finished goods |
25,339,347 | 24,815,693 | ||||||
$ | 119,457,528 | $ | 100,728,730 | |||||
- 8 -
(6) | The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS): |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerators: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator for both basic and diluted EPS, net income |
$ | 38,472,169 | $ | 34,057,330 | $ | 80,805,051 | $ | 66,519,460 | ||||||||
Denominators: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic EPS, weighted-average shares outstanding |
142,279,210 | 139,124,771 | 142,071,203 | 138,697,007 | ||||||||||||
Potentially dilutive shares resulting from stock plans |
1,917,784 | 1,421,509 | 1,992,412 | 1,365,635 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted EPS |
144,196,994 | 140,546,280 | 144,063,615 | 140,062,642 | ||||||||||||
Shares related to stock plans not included in diluted
average common shares outstanding because their
effect would be antidilutive |
1,078,512 | 285,998 | 307,231 | 301,038 |
(7) | Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
At June 30, 2011, the Company had two stock option plans, a restricted stock plan and an employee stock purchase plan. Readers should refer to Note 6 of our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2010, for additional information related to these stock-based compensation plans. |
The Company recognized compensation expense for share-based payments of $2,822,986 and $5,451,588 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory as of June 30, 2011, was $152,150. |
Employee Stock Option Plan |
The fair value of each option grant in the Employee Stock Option Plan was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the indicated periods: |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
2.68 | % | 2.73 | % | 2.71 | % | 2.72 | % | ||||||||
Expected volatility |
40.80 | % | 41.04 | % | 40.59 | % | 40.82 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.62 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.93 | % | 2.17 | % | ||||||||
Expected term of options (in years) |
4.05 | 4.19 | 4.05 | 4.20 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average grant-date fair value |
$ | 8.13 | $ | 5.01 | $ | 8.24 | $ | 5.29 |
- 9 -
(7) | Stock-Based Compensation Plans (continued) |
The Company determined that all employee groups exhibit similar exercise and post-vesting termination behavior to determine the expected term. Under the plan, the option exercise price equals the stocks market price on date of grant. The options vest after one to five years, and expire after five to seven years. |
As of June 30, 2011, there was $18,710,704 of unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based payments which is expected to be recognized over the vesting periods. |
Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan |
As of June 30, 2011, there was $331,225 of unrecognized compensation cost under this plan related to share-based payments which are expected to be recognized over the balance of the 2011 calendar year. Under the plan, the option exercise price equals the stocks market price on date of grant. The options vest after six months, and expire after ten years. |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan covering 1,200,000 shares that was approved by the shareholders, replacing a prior plan. Under the plan, the Company sells shares at 85% of the stocks market price at date of purchase. Under ASC 718, the 15% discounted value is recognized as compensation expense. |
Restricted Stock Plan |
The Company has a Restricted Stock Plan covering 2,000,000 shares of common stock that was approved by the shareholders. The purpose of the plan is to permit grants of shares, subject to restrictions, to key employees of the Company as a means of retaining and rewarding them for long-term performance and to increase their ownership in the Company. Shares awarded under the plan entitle the shareholder to all rights of common stock ownership except that the shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, exchanged or otherwise disposed of during the restriction period. The restriction period is determined by the Compensation Committee, appointed by the Board of Directors, but may not exceed ten years under the terms of the plan. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had unearned stock-based compensation of $7,104,904 associated with these restricted stock grants. The unearned stock-based compensation related to these grants is being amortized to compensation expense over the applicable restriction periods. Amortization expense from restricted stock grants in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, were $495,065 and $967,987, respectively. |
(8) | Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. For the Company, comprehensive income represents net income adjusted for items such as unrealized gains and losses on investments and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income was as follows: |
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Quarter Ended |
$ | 35,965,412 | $ | 23,884,823 | ||||
Six Months Ended |
$ | 83,278,217 | $ | 57,763,874 |
- 10 -
(9) | The increase in common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily due to the issuance of 826,375 shares of the Companys common stock under its stock-based compensation plans. The Company announced a $0.01 per share increase in its quarterly cash dividend rate during the first quarter of 2011, which resulted in a recorded cash dividend of $0.12 per share in the first and second quarters of 2011. The second quarter dividend of approximately $17,174,000, was declared on June 8, 2011 and was paid on July 22, 2011. |
(10) | The Company currently manufactures electro-optic products, including automatic-dimming rearview mirrors for the automotive industry, and fire protection products for the commercial construction industry. The Company also develops and manufactures variably dimmable windows for the aerospace industry and non-auto dimming rearview automotive mirrors with electronic features: |
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Automotive Products |
$ | 238,191,803 | $ | 196,415,200 | $ | 484,482,581 | $ | 377,943,989 | ||||||||
Other |
4,809,738 | 5,145,760 | 9,464,857 | 9,385,900 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 243,001,541 | $ | 201,560,960 | $ | 493,947,438 | $ | 387,329,889 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Automotive Products |
$ | 53,515,749 | $ | 48,733,906 | $ | 113,926,971 | $ | 93,911,307 | ||||||||
Other |
(268,857 | ) | 52,853 | (589,205 | ) | (516,651 | ) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 53,246,892 | $ | 48,786,759 | $ | 113,337,766 | $ | 93,394,656 | ||||||||
The Other segment includes Fire Protection Products and Dimmable Aircraft Windows. |
- 11 -
Item 2. | Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: |
SECOND QUARTER 2011 VERSUS SECOND QUARTER 2010 |
Net Sales. Net sales for the second quarter of 2011 increased by approximately $41,441,000, or 21%, when compared with the second quarter last year. Net sales of the Companys automotive mirrors (including features) increased by approximately $41,777,000, or 21%, in the second quarter of 2011, when compared with the second quarter last year, primarily due to a 22% increase in auto-dimming mirror unit shipments from approximately 4,178,000 in the second quarter 2010 to approximately 5,094,000 in the current quarter. This unit increase was primarily due to increased penetration of auto-dimming mirrors on 2011 model year vehicles. Unit shipments to customers in North America for the current quarter increased by 21% compared with the second quarter of the prior year, primarily due to increased auto-dimming mirror unit shipments for domestic automakers. Mirror unit shipments for the current quarter to automotive customers outside North America increased by 22% compared with the second quarter in 2010, primarily due to increased auto-dimming mirror unit shipments to certain European and Korean automakers. The Companys net sales were negatively impacted by approximately $17 million in the second quarter of 2011 as a result of customer automotive plant shutdowns and part shortages due to the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. |
Other net sales decreased by approximately $336,000, or 7% for the current quarter versus the same quarter of last year, due to a 37% decrease in dimmable aircraft window net sales, partially offset by a 2% increase in fire protection sales. The decrease in dimmable window net sales was primarily due to the continued delays affecting the production and delivery of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner series of aircraft. The increase in fire protection net sales was primarily due to the continued improvement in the commercial construction market. |
Cost of Goods Sold. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased from 63.3% in the second quarter of 2010 to 64.8% in the second quarter of 2011. This quarter-over-quarter percentage increase in cost of goods sold primarily reflected the impact of annual automotive customer price reductions and costs associated with supply chain constraints on certain automotive-grade electronic components. Each factor is estimated to have impacted cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales approximately equally. Costs associated with supply chain constraints resulted from changes in purchasing channels to secure additional parts due to the fast ramp-up in automotive light vehicle production in the second half of 2010 into the first half of 2011 and due to the March 11 Japan earthquake and tsunami. |
Operating Expenses. Engineering, research and development (E, R & D) expenses for the current quarter increased 33% and approximately $5,023,000 when compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to additional hiring of employee and outside contract engineering/development services to support new product development projects and program awards. |
Selling, general and administrative (S, G & A) expenses increased 23% and approximately $2,247,000 for the current quarter, when compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to the Companys overseas office expenses and foreign exchange rates. Foreign exchange rates accounted for approximately five percentage points of the quarter over quarter increase. |
Total Other Income. Total other income for the current quarter increased by approximately $2,947,000, when compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to realized gains on the sale of equity investments and changes in the foreign currency rate related to the Companys Euro denominated account quarter over quarter. Each factor is estimated to have approximately equally impacted the increase in other income. |
Taxes. The provision for income taxes varied from the statutory rate during the current quarter, primarily due to the domestic manufacturing deduction. |
Net Income. Net income for the second quarter of 2011 increased by approximately $4,415,000, when compared with the same quarter last year, primarily due to increased net sales and gross profit. |
-12-
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011, VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 |
Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately $106,618,000, or 28%, when compared with the same period last year. Net sales of the Companys automotive mirrors increased by approximately $106,539,000, or 28% period over period, as auto-dimming mirror unit shipments increased by 28% from approximately 8,209,000 in the first six months of 2010 to approximately 10,512,000 in the first six months of 2011. The increase was primarily due to increased light vehicle production in North America and Europe as well as increased penetration of auto-dimming mirrors on 2011 model year vehicles. Unit shipments to customers in North America increased by 31% during the first six months of 2011 versus the same period in 2010, primarily due to increased auto-dimming mirror unit shipments for domestic automakers. Mirror unit shipments to automotive customers outside North America increased by 26% period over period, primarily due to increased auto-dimming mirror unit shipments to certain European automakers. The Companys net sales were negatively impacted by approximately $20 million in the first six months of 2011 as a result of customer automotive plant shutdowns and part shortages due to the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. |
Other net sales increased by 1% period over period, due to a 3% increase in fire protection sales, mostly offset by a 9% decrease in dimmable window sales. The period over period increase in fire protection net sales was primarily due to the continued improvement in the commercial construction market. The period over period decrease in dimmable window net sales was primarily due to the continued delays affecting the production and delivery of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner series of aircraft. |
Cost of Goods Sold. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold increased from 63.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2010, to 64.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2011. This percentage increase primarily reflected the impact of annual automotive customer price reductions, partially offset by the Companys ability to leverage fixed overhead costs. In addition, costs associated with supply chain constraints on certain automotive-grade electronic components (which occurred for the same reason as the current quarter) increased cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales by approximately a half of one percentage point. |
Operating Expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, engineering, research and development expenses increased 32% and approximately $9,599,000, when compared with the same period last year, primarily due to additional hiring of employee and outside contract engineering/development services to support new product development projects and program awards. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 20% and approximately $3,937,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, when compared with the same period last year, primarily due to the Companys overseas office expenses and foreign exchange rates. Foreign exchange rates accounted for approximately three percentage points of the period over period increase. |
Total Other Income. Total other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011, increased by approximately $3,234,000, when compared with the same period last year, primarily due to changes in the foreign currency rate related to the Companys Euro denominated account. |
Taxes. The provision for income taxes varied from the statutory rate during the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the domestic manufacturing deduction. |
Net Income. Net income increased by approximately $14,286,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, when compared with the same period last year, primarily due to increased net sales and gross profit. |
-13-
FINANCIAL CONDITION: |
Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2011, increased approximately $96,270,000 compared to December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to cash flow from operations and fixed income maturities, partially offset by capital expenditures and dividends paid. |
Short-term investments as of June 30, 2011, decreased approximately $62,331,000 compared with December 31, 2010, primarily due to fixed income investment maturities that were not re-invested during the period ending June 30, 2011. |
Accounts receivable as of June 30, 2011 increased approximately $16,211,000 compared with December 31, 2010, primarily due to the higher sales level as well as monthly sales within each of those quarters. |
Inventory as of June 30, 2011 increased approximately $18,729,000 compared with December 31, 2010, primarily due to higher sales and production levels in conjunction with increased lead times for certain electronic component raw materials inventory. |
Long-term investments as of June 30, 2011, increased approximately $13,594,000 compared to December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of additional equity securities. |
Accounts payable as of June 30, 2011, increased approximately $22,988,000 compared to December 31, 2010, primarily due to increased production levels and capital spending. |
Cash flow from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, increased approximately $37,509,000 to approximately $104,615,000, compared with approximately $67,106,000, during the same period last year, primarily due to the increase in net income and changes in inventories, accounts payable and accounts receivable discussed above. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2011, were $48,995,000, compared with $19,095,000 for the same period last year, primarily due to increased production equipment purchases. |
The Company has historically expanded its plant capacity on a step-function basis every five to six years. In light of strong customer demand for the Companys auto-dimming mirrors and a more complex product mix, the Company has recently been increasing its production line and facility capacity more quickly. The Company now estimates 2011 capital expenditures of approximately $100 $115 million primarily due to increased production equipment purchases of approximately $70-$80 million and new facility costs of approximately $30-$35 million to increase production plant capacity, which will be financed from existing cash and/or cash equivalents on hand. Capital expenditures pertaining to anticipated new facility costs are to increase plant capacity in the electronic assembly, final assembly, rear camera display and exterior mirror manufacturing areas. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2011 is now estimated at approximately $41-$44 million. |
Management considers the Companys working capital and long-term investments totaling approximately $764,528,000 as of June 30, 2011, together with internally generated cash flow and an unsecured $5,000,000 line of credit from a bank, to be sufficient to cover anticipated cash needs for the next year and for the foreseeable future. |
On October 8, 2002, the Company announced a share repurchase plan, under which it may purchase up to 8,000,000 shares (post-split) based on a number of factors, including market conditions, the market price of the Companys common stock, anti-dilutive effect on earnings, available cash and other factors that the Company deems appropriate. On July 20, 2005, the Company announced that it had raised the price at which the Company may repurchase shares under the existing plan. On May 16, 2006, the Company announced that the Companys Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of an additional 8,000,000 shares under the plan. On August 14, 2006, the Company announced that the Companys Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of an additional 8,000,000 shares under the plan. On February 26, 2008, the Company announced that the Companys Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of an additional 4,000,000 shares under the plan. The following is a summary of quarterly share repurchase activity under the plan to date: |
Total Number of | ||||||||
Shares Purchased | Cost of | |||||||
Quarter Ended | (Post-Split) | Shares Purchased | ||||||
March 31, 2003 |
830,000 | $ | 10,246,810 | |||||
September 30, 2005 |
1,496,059 | 25,214,573 | ||||||
March 31, 2006 |
2,803,548 | 47,145,310 | ||||||
June 30, 2006 |
7,201,081 | 104,604,414 | ||||||
September 30, 2006 |
3,968,171 | 55,614,102 | ||||||
December 31, 2006 |
1,232,884 | 19,487,427 | ||||||
March 31, 2007 |
447,710 | 7,328,015 | ||||||
March 31, 2008 |
2,200,752 | 34,619,490 | ||||||
June 30, 2008 |
1,203,560 | 19,043,775 | ||||||
September 30, 2008 |
2,519,153 | 39,689,410 | ||||||
December 31, 2008 |
2,125,253 | 17,907,128 | ||||||
Total |
26,028,171 | $ | 380,900,454 |
1,971,829 shares remain authorized to be repurchased under the plan as of June 30, 2011. |
-14-
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES: |
The preparation of the Companys consolidated condensed financial statements contained in this report, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that may not be readily apparent from other sources. Historically, actual results have not been materially different from the Companys estimates. However, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. |
The Company has identified the critical accounting policies used in determining estimates and assumptions in the amounts reported in its Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Management believes there have been no significant changes in those critical accounting policies during the most recently completed quarter. |
TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS: | ||
The Company previously announced a number of OEM and dealer or port-installed programs for its Rear Camera Display (RCD) Mirror that consists of a liquid crystal display (LCD) that shows a panoramic video of objects behind the vehicle in real time. During the current quarter, the Company announced that its RCD Mirror is offered on the Nissan NV commercial van for the U.S. market. The Company is currently shipping auto-dimming mirrors with RCD for 63 vehicle models with 9 automakers. The Company is also shipping auto-dimming mirrors with RCD for over 20 aftermarket or dealer-installed programs. |
In February of 2008, the President signed into law the Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had one year to initiate rulemaking to revise the federal standard to expand the field of view so that drivers can detect objects directly behind vehicles. NHTSA then had two years to determine how automakers must meet the rules. |
NHTSAs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the law became available on December 3, 2010, and was formally posted in the Federal Register on December 7, 2010. NHTSA indicated in the NPRM that all new vehicles under 10,000 lbs. in the United States will be required to have backup camera-based systems by September 2014 (the phase-in schedule indicated by NHTSA at that time was that 10% of all cars and 33% of trucks sold in the U.S. must meet the standard by September 2012; 40% of all cars and 67% of trucks by September 2013 and 100% by September 2014). That proposed rule was open for public comment for 60 days, and the issuance of the final rule was expected by February 28, 2011. On March 2, 2011, an update was published in the Federal Register, summarizing a February 25, 2011 letter from the U.S. Secretary of Transportation to Congress indicating that NHTSA would not meet the February 28, 2011 deadline and that the comment period would be re-opened for an additional 45 days to April 18, 2011. In addition, it was announced that NHTSA would hold a public meeting in Washington to exchange ideas on the backover issue, and that NHTSA would also host a technical workshop to address questions regarding the proposed testing procedure and other technical items. The letter further indicated that NHTSA would publish the final rule by December 31, 2011. Also published on March 2, 2011 were a number of corrections, including a change to the phase-in period on the regulation for trucks so that it aligned with the schedule for cars (10% by September 2012, 40% by September 2013 and 100% by September 2014). |
On July 6, 2011, the Department of Transportation posted an update on its web-site, indicating that the final rule is scheduled to go to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by September 24, 2011. It further stated that the rule will receive clearance from the OMB by December 23, 2011; and that the publication date of the final rule will be by December 31, 2011. |
-15-
The Company believes that its cost-competitive RCD Mirror product is an optimum, ergonomic, easily adaptable method to display the image produced by the rear camera for increased safety, and automakers could install rear cameras with the display in a RCD Mirror to satisfy the requirements of the legislation. However, the Company also believes that this will be a very competitive market, as there are a number of different locations that the image from the camera can be displayed in the vehicle by automakers. Potential display locations include the rearview mirror, the navigation system, and other radio or multi-purpose displays in the vehicle. While it is too soon to determine what portion of the market will utilize the Companys RCD Mirror, the Company hopes that RCD Mirror unit shipments will continue to grow and be offered on an increasing number of vehicle models, notwithstanding that some customers may take a wait and see approach to comply with the Act until all rule making is final. The Company continues to believe that its RCD Mirror product will be implemented in three overlapping phases by automakers: |
1. | Market-Driven Phase: includes the time period prior to any legislation through NHTSAs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on December 7, 2010. | ||
2. | Wait and See Phase: includes the time period from when the legislation was signed into law until the final rule is issued, which is currently expected by December 31, 2011. | ||
3. | Implementation Phase: includes the time period from the issuance of the final rule until September 2014, when 100% of all new vehicles in the U.S. under 10,000 lbs. will be required to be equipped with rear cameras and displays. |
The Company previously announced it is shipping auto-dimming mirrors with SmartBeam®, its proprietary intelligent high-beam headlamp assist feature to a number of automakers. During the current quarter, the Company announced that SmartBeam is now offered on the Dodge Durango and the Dodge Charger. The Company also recently announced that SmartBeam is now available on the new 2011 Audi A7 for the European market. The Company started shipping RCD Mirrors during the second quarter of 2011 to Acura/Honda for one model; Acura/Honda does not allow suppliers to announce vehicle programs in a news release. The Company is currently shipping auto-dimming mirrors with SmartBeam for 60 vehicle models to 13 automakers. |
The Company previously reached and announced an agreement with PPG Aerospace to work together to provide the variably dimmable windows for the passenger compartment on the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner series of aircraft. The Company began delivering windows to the production line during the second quarter of 2010. However, Boeing announced further delays in customer deliveries due to an in-flight issue (unrelated to the Companys products) experienced back in November of 2010 on a test plane. Boeing now expects the first delivery of the 787 Dreamliner Series of Aircraft to occur later in calendar year 2011. The Company and PPG Aerospace previously announced that they will work together to supply dimmable windows to Hawker Beechcraft Corporation for the passenger-cabin windows of the 2010 Beechcraft King Air 350i airplane. |
As a result of the fast ramp-up in automotive light vehicle production in the second half of 2010 and the continuation into the first half of 2011, the Company continued to experience increased costs associated with supply chain constraints on certain automotive-grade electronic components. Although availability of certain automotive-grade components remained tight, the Company did experience continued sequential improvement in this area during both the first and second quarters of 2011. |
However, the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami in Japan resulted in the Company experiencing additional increased costs associated with supply chain constraints on certain automotive-grade electronic components during the second quarter of 2011. While the Company was successful in securing additional quantities of constrained parts during the current quarter to meet anticipated customer demand, the additional secured parts purchased during the current quarter did come at a higher cost due to changes in purchasing channels. |
The Company currently believes that it will experience some sequential reduction in supply chain-related costs during the third quarter of 2011; however, the current environment is constantly changing and it is not known what the ultimate affect will be on the supply chain, global light vehicle production, the auto industry and the Company in the second half of the 2011 calendar year. |
Based on the July IHS forecast for light vehicle production levels and the Companys anticipated product mix, the Company believes that it has secured an adequate supply of parts for the third quarter of 2011. |
-16-
The Company continues to experience significant pricing pressures from its automotive customers and competitors, which have affected, and which will continue to affect, its margins to the extent that the Company is unable to offset the price reductions with engineering and purchasing cost reductions, productivity improvements, and increases in unit sales volume, each of which pose a challenge. In addition, financial pressures and increasing production volumes at certain automakers are resulting in increased cost reduction efforts by them, including requests for additional price reductions, decontenting certain features from vehicles, customer market testing of future business, dual sourcing initiatives and warranty cost-sharing programs, which could adversely impact the Companys sales growth, margins, profitability and, as a result, its share price. |
The automotive industry has always been cyclical and highly impacted by levels of economic activity. The current economic environment continues to be uncertain and continues to cause increased production and financial stresses evidenced by volatile production levels, supply chain disruptions, supplier part shortages, automotive plant shutdowns, customer and supplier bankruptcies, commodity material cost increases, consumer shift to smaller vehicles where the Company has a lower penetration rate and lower content per vehicle due to increased fuel costs and environmental concerns. If additional automotive customers (including their Tier 1 suppliers) experience bankruptcies, work stoppages, strikes, part shortages, etc., it could disrupt the Companys shipments to these customers, which could adversely affect the Companys sales, margins, profitability and, as a result, its share price. |
Automakers continue to experience increased volatility and uncertainty in executing planned new programs which have, in some cases, resulted in delays or cancellations of new vehicle platforms, package reconfigurations and inaccurate volume forecasts. This increased volatility and uncertainty has made it more difficult for the Company to forecast future sales and effectively manage costs and utilize capital, as well as engineering, research and development, and human resource investments. |
The Company currently estimates that top line revenue will increase approximately 25-30% in the third quarter of 2011 compared with the third quarter of 2010, based on the July IHS forecast for current light vehicle production forecasts in the regions to which the Company ships product, as well as the estimated option rates for the Companys mirrors on vehicle models and anticipated product mix. These estimates also reflect the fact that the Company does not anticipate any continuing negative revenue impact due to the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan during the third quarter of 2011 (other than any reflected in the July IHS forecast). Uncertainties, including the light vehicle production levels, supply chain disruptions, supplier part shortages, automotive plant shutdowns, work stoppages, customer inventory management, sales rates in Asia, North America and Europe, and the impact of potential automotive customer (including their Tier 1 suppliers) bankruptcies, strikes, etc., which could disrupt Company shipments to these customers, make forecasting difficult. Due to continued uncertainties with global vehicle production volumes and the situation in Japan, it is a very difficult environment to forecast, and as a result, the Company is not providing total revenue estimates beyond the third quarter of 2011 at this time. |
The Company currently expects that its gross margin in the third quarter of 2011 will slightly improve sequentially from the second quarter of 2011, primarily due to reductions in supply chain related costs, partially offset by annual customer price reductions. |
The Company also estimates that engineering, research and development expenses are currently expected to increase approximately 25-30% in the third quarter of 2011 compared with the same quarter in 2010, primarily due to continued hiring of employee and outside contract engineering/development services to support product development projects and program awards. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses are currently expected to increase approximately 15-20% in the third quarter of 2011 compared with the same quarter in 2010, primarily due to increased overseas office expenses. |
Based on the July IHS forecast for light vehicle production levels for the entire 2011 year, the Company now estimates that SmartBeam® unit shipments will increase approximately 60-70% in calendar year 2011 compared with calendar year 2010. |
Based on the July IHS forecast for light vehicle production levels for the entire 2011 year, the Company now estimates that RCD Mirror unit shipments will increase approximately 40% in calendar year 2011 compared with calendar year 2010. |
-17-
The Company utilizes the light vehicle production forecasting services of IHS Worldwide, and IHSs July forecast for light vehicle production for the third quarter of 2011 are approximately 3.2 million units for North America, 4.4 million for Europe and 3.2 million for Japan and Korea. IHSs end of June forecast for light vehicle production for calendar year 2011 are approximately 13.0 million for North America, 20.0 million for Europe and 11.9 million for Japan and Korea. The July IHS forecast for light vehicle production is based on the following IHS assumptions regarding the situation in Japan: |
| Virtually all automakers are now back to running full production volumes, with certain Japanese automakers still lagging in some regions. | ||
| Total lost industry production volume to reach approximately 2.7 million vehicle units. | ||
| Build back of lost production volume will begin early summer 2011 and extend into 2012, with varying levels of replacement depending on the automaker. |
| The current assumption is that 20% of lost volume will be recovered in 2011 with the remainder of the lost volume that will be recovered to occur in 2012. | ||
| It is also assumed that 23% of the Japan automakers lost volume will not be recovered. |
The Company is subject to market risk exposures of varying correlations and volatilities, including foreign exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and equity price risk. Volatile equity markets could negatively impact the Companys financial performance due to realized losses on the sale of equity investments and/or recognized losses due to an other-than-temporary impairment adjustment on available-for-sale securities (mark-to-market adjustments). During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. |
The Company has some assets, liabilities and operations outside the United States, including a Euro denominated account, which currently are not significant overall to the Company as a whole. Because the Company sells its automotive mirrors throughout the world, and automotive manufacturing is highly dependent on general economic conditions, the Company could be affected by uncertain economic conditions in foreign markets that can reduce demand for its products. |
In light of the continuing financial stresses within the worldwide automotive industry, certain automakers and tier one customer are considering the sale of certain business segments or may be considering bankruptcy. Should one or more of the Companys larger customers (including sales through their Tier 1 suppliers) declare bankruptcy or sell their business, it could adversely affect the collection of receivables, sales, margins, profitability and, as a result, its share price. The volatile economic environment continues to cause increased financial pressures and production stresses on the Companys customers, which could impact timely customer payments and ultimately the collectibility of receivables. |
The Company does not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have not been recorded in its consolidated financial statements. |
Item 3. | Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
The information called for by this item is provided under the caption Trends and Developments under Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Item 4. | Controls And Procedures. |
The Companys management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of June 30, 2011, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Companys management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2011, were adequate and effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
-18-
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may routinely modify, upgrade, and enhance its internal controls and procedures over financial reporting. However, there was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting [as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act] that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. | ||
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT: |
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, that are based on managements beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the global automotive industry, the economy, the ability to control and leverage fixed manufacturing overhead costs, unit shipment and net sales growth rates, the ability to control E,R&D and S,G&A expenses, gross margins and the Company itself. Words like anticipates, believes, confident, estimates, expects, forecast, hopes, likely, plans, projects, optimistic, and should, and variations of such words and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These statements do not guarantee future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, expense, likelihood and degree of occurrence. These risks include, without limitation, employment and general economic conditions, worldwide automotive production, the maintenance of the Companys market share, the ability to achieve purchasing cost reductions, customer inventory management, supplier part shortages, competitive pricing pressures, currency fluctuations, interest rates, equity prices, the financial strength/stability of the Companys customers (including their Tier 1 suppliers), supply chain disruptions, impact of natural disasters on supply chain and vehicle production, potential sale of OEM business segments or suppliers, potential customer (including their Tier 1 suppliers) bankruptcies, the mix of products purchased by customers, the ability to continue to make product innovations, the market for Rear Camera Display Mirrors and the success of those products, the success of certain other products (e.g. SmartBeam®), and other risks identified in the Companys other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what is expressed or forecasted. Furthermore, the Company undertakes no obligation to update, amend, or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
Information regarding risk factors appears in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I Item 2 of this Form 10-Q and in Part I Item 1A Risk Factors of the Companys report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, except to the extent described in Part I Item 2 of this Form 10-Q. |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
See Exhibit Index on Page 22. |
-19-
GENTEX CORPORATION | ||||
Date: August 4, 2011
|
/s/ Fred T. Bauer
|
|||
Chairman and Chief | ||||
Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 4, 2011
|
/s/ Steven A. Dykman
|
|||
Vice President Finance, | ||||
Principal Financial and | ||||
Accounting Officer |
-20-
Exhibit No. | Description | Page | ||||
3 | (a) | Registrants Restated Articles of Incorporation, adopted on August 20, 2004, were
filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated November 2, 2004,
and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
|
||||
3 | (b) | Registrants Bylaws as amended and restated February 27, 2003, were filed as
Exhibit 3(b)(1) to
Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated May 5, 2003, and the same are hereby
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
4 | (a) | A specimen form of certificate for the Registrants common stock, par value $.06
per share, were filed as part of a Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 2-74226C) as Exhibit 3(a), as amended by Amendment No. 3 to such
Registration Statement, and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
4 | (b) | Amended and Restated Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated as of March
29, 2001, including as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of Adoption of Resolution
Establishing Series of Shares of Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the
Company, and as Exhibit B the form of Rights Certificate and of Election to
Exercise, was filed as Exhibit 4(b) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated
April 27, 2001, and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
10 | (a)(1) | A Lease dated August 15, 1981, was filed as part of a Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration Number 2-74226C) as Exhibit 9(a)(1), and the same is
hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
10 | (a)(2) | First Amendment to Lease dated June 28, 1985, was filed as Exhibit 10(m) to
Registrants Report on Form 10-K dated March 18, 1986, and the same is hereby
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(1) | Gentex Corporation Qualified Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated, effective
February 26, 2004) was included in Registrants Proxy Statement dated April 6, 2004, filed with
the Commission on April 6, 2004, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(2) | First Amendment to Gentex Corporation Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated
February 26, 2004) was filed as Exhibit 10(b)(2) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated
August 2, 2005, and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(3) | Specimen form of Grant Agreement for the Gentex Corporation Qualified Stock Option Plan
(as amended and restated, effective February
26, 2004) was filed as Exhibit 10(b)(3) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated November 1,
2005, and the same is hereby
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(4) | Gentex Corporation Second Restricted Stock Plan was filed as Exhibit 10(b)(2) to Registrants
Report on Form 10-Q dated April 27,
2001, and the same is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(5) | First Amendment to the Gentex Corporation Second Restricted Stock Plan was filed as Exhibit
10(b)(5) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated August 4, 2008, and the same is hereby
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||
*10 | (b)(6) | Specimen form of Grant Agreement for the Gentex Corporation Restricted Stock Plan, was filed
as Exhibit 10(b)(4) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated November 2, 2004, and the same
is hereby incorporated herein by reference. |
-21-
Exhibit No. | Description | Page | ||||||
*10 | (b)(7) | Gentex Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (adopted March 6, 2002),
was filed as Exhibit 10(b)(4) to Registrants
Report on Form 10-Q dated April 30, 2002, and the same is incorporated herein by reference. |
||||||
*10 | (b)(8) | Specimen form of Grant Agreement for the Gentex Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan, was filed as Exhibit 10(b)(6) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated November 2,
2004, and the same is hereby
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||||
10 | (c) | The form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and each of the Registrants directors
and certain officers was filed as Exhibit 10 (e) to Registrants Report on Form 10-Q dated
October 31, 2002, and the same is
incorporated herein by reference. |
||||||
31.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Gentex Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
|
23 | ||||||
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Gentex Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
|
24 | ||||||
32 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gentex Corporation
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).
|
25 |
* | Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement. |
-22-
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gentex Corporation; | ||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | ||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods, presented in this quarterly report; | ||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d) | disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2011 | /s/ Fred T. Bauer | |||
Fred T. Bauer | ||||
Chief Executive Officer |
23
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gentex Corporation; | ||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | ||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods, presented in this quarterly report; | ||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] and internal control over financial reporting [as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)] for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | ||
c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and | ||
d) | disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 4, 2011 | /s/ Steven A. Dykman | |||
Steven A. Dykman | ||||
Vice President Finance |
24
(1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | ||
(2) | The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gentex Corporation. |
Dated: August 4, 2011
|
GENTEX CORPORATION | |||||
By | /s/ Fred T. Bauer
|
|||||
Its Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
By | /s/ Steven A. Dykman
|
|||||
Its Vice President Finance and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
25